|
| | Agree wholeheartedly. I saw this film a couple months ago at a film fest and after the first half hour immediately thought "comedy of the year". Not even the most prude viewer left without a hearty belly laugh under their belts. Apart from the hilarity, a nice perk: it's probably the best film to explore the nature of comedy itself... what is funny and why? This film comes the closest to actually answering that elusive question. |
| |
|
| | couldn't you have done a review without blurting out the coveted punchline? Nice spoiler. |
| |
|
| | Does knowing the "punchline" of the joke really spoil anything? I thought the whole point was that the punchline is superfluous and the buildup is the important part. |
| |
|
| | punchline and buildup were both included in the review...sure I understand its all the way its told, but why sully the viewing experience by building it up even once? what purpose does it serve to the rest of the review? |
| |
| Posted 08/17/2005 - 10:19:04 PM by : |
| | Guy logs onto Stylus. Reads The Aristocrats review and comments box. Proceeds to enfold the menstruated crusts of a flabby half-clubbed feline sealcub`s swollen vulval lips over his head and then plucks out splinters from its buttcrack to jab them through his foreskin. Does it all in words in a public forum. Stylus editor asks "what the hell is that?" Writer replies I call it the `Hibeside`. |
| |
|
| | The Sophisticates! |
| |