Posted 11/04/2005 - 10:01:02 AM by boilingboy: | |
Now, THIS is more like it: An artist who is commercial, but has given us innovative, trancendent music in the past. Reviewing 50-something artists who ruled the charts in the 70s is not a crime. Please just make sure they are (were)important artists, and not just childhood faves. | |
Posted 11/04/2005 - 06:07:24 PM by TheBrad: | |
And how does one ensure that? | |
Posted 11/07/2005 - 10:59:43 PM by boilingboy: | |
Is that a legitimate question, or just a lazy attempt to be provacative? | |